home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0630>
- <link 94XP0550>
- <link 94TO0161>
- <title>
- May 16, 1994: Rwanda:Kind Words, But Not Much More
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- May 16, 1994 "There are no devils...":Rwanda
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- COVER STORY, Page 61
- Kind Words, but Not Much More
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> The pictures are as appalling as any that have come across
- global television screens, yet no one is calling for direct
- intervention to stop the month-old killing spree in Rwanda.
- However troubled they might be by the scale and ferocity of
- the slaughter, Western nations have offered little more than
- emotional expressions of sympathy for the victims.
- </p>
- <p> The American appetite for such missions, even in cases of dire
- human need, has been dulled by experiences like Somalia. "Lesson
- No. 1," President Clinton said last week, "is, Don't go into
- one of these things and say, maybe we'll be done in a month
- because it's a humanitarian crisis." His reluctance mirrors
- the public's: a TIME/CNN poll last week showed that only 34%
- of respondents favored doing something to quell the violence,
- while 51% opposed any action. Clinton confirmed that judgment
- with a new presidential directive on U.S. participation in peacekeeping
- abroad: those operations, it says, "should not be open-ended
- commitments, but linked to concrete political solutions."
- </p>
- <p> Rwanda is an almost perfect example of the problem Clinton's
- directive addresses. The horrifying slaughter is another explosion
- in a mainly ethnically based civil war that outsiders understand
- imperfectly if at all--and therefore do not know how to solve.
- No one is even certain what sort of diplomatic efforts might
- persuade the Rwandan factions to halt the bloodletting. The
- only obvious alternative to traditional diplomacy would be for
- a well-equipped army to move into Rwanda--shooting if necessary--and force a cease-fire. But no one is volunteering for such
- an army.
- </p>
- <p> A U.N. peacekeeping force already in Rwanda to police an agreement
- last August for power sharing with Tutsi rebels in the Hutu-led
- government was hastily reduced from 2,600 to 470 when the massacres
- began and 10 Belgian blue helmets were killed. The signal sent,
- says a senior African diplomat, "was, Look, you are on your
- own. You may do whatever you want."
- </p>
- <p> Sanctions, the response of choice at the U.N., are widely regarded
- as useless in this case: Rwanda's economy is already destitute,
- and people are fighting just to stay alive. As the situation
- worsens, Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali is looking
- for about 8,000 troops to send into the country to stop the
- killing. He has asked the Organization of African Unity to take
- on the responsibility, but has had no response.
- </p>
- <p> Special envoys are in motion, and humanitarian organizations
- are pleading for the creation of safe havens for refugees inside
- Rwanda. But the example of Bosnia's safe areas encourages no
- one, and the only aid being delivered is to the vast new camps
- across Rwanda's borders in Tanzania and Burundi. At the U.N.,
- there is only a vague hope for a cease-fire. "We are at a loss
- to know what to do," says an Asian delegate. The butchery is
- "inhuman, ghastly," says U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda David Rawson.
- Still, says another State Department official, "it's not that
- we have any plan." There is not likely to be one anytime soon.
- "We have got to hope that these people will understand that
- they are brothers," says Rawson. "They cannot kill each other
- forever." The tragedy is that thousands more are likely to die
- trying.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-